경인행정학회

키워드

초록

본 연구는 인구감소, 경제 침체, 기술 변화 속에서 지방정부가 직면한 재정적 부담과 재원 조달 제약을 해소하기 위한 대안적 민관협력(PPP) 방안을 탐색하였다. 특히 본 연구는 경상북도 사례분석을 통해 크라우드펀딩을 지속가능하고 포용적인 재원조달 메커니즘으로 통합한 지역재생 맞춤형 프레임워크를 제안하였다.

본 연구는 이론적 검토 및 비교사례 분석을 토대로 크라우드펀딩 기반의 지역재생에 대한 세 가지 전략적 모델을 제시하였다. 첫째, 지방정부가 직접 크라우드펀딩 중개기관을 설립·운영하는 중개기관 설립형 모델, 둘째, 지역의 사회적 기업을 육성하여 중개기관으로 기능하게 하는 중개기관 인큐베이팅형 모델, 셋째, 기존 민간 크라우드펀딩 기업과의 공식계약을 활용하는 중개기관 위탁형 모델이다. 이들 모델은 시민참여를 확대하고, 재원을 동원하며, 지역 공동체 활성화를 촉진하는 차별화된 경로를 제공한다.

궁극적으로 본 연구는 크라우드펀딩을 협력적 거버넌스 구조 속에 내재화함으로써, 지방정부가 장기적인 지역쇠퇴와 인구감소의 위험을 완화할 수 있는 정책적 기반을 마련하는 데 목적을 두고 연구결과를 도출하고자 하였다.

This study investigates alternative public–private partnership (PPP) approaches to overcome the increasing fiscal burdens and financing constraints faced by local governments in the context of rapid demographic decline, economic stagnation, and technological change. Focusing on North Gyeongsang Province, South Korea, the research seeks to propose a customized regional regeneration framework that integrates crowdfunding as a sustainable and inclusive financing mechanism.
Through theoretical review and comparative case analysis, the study introduces three strategic models of crowdfunding-based regional regeneration: (1) the Intermediary Enterprise Establishment Model, in which local governments directly create and manage a crowdfunding intermediary; (2) the Intermediary Enterprise Incubation Model, where local social enterprises are nurtured to operate as intermediaries; and (3) the Intermediary Enterprise Contracting Model, which utilizes existing private-sector crowdfunding firms through formal agreements. These models offer differentiated pathways to enhance citizen participation, mobilize resources, and stimulate regional revitalization.
Ultimately, the study aims to provide a policy foundation for local governments to address long-term risks of regional decline and depopulation by embedding crowdfunding within a collaborative governance structure.

목차

I. Introduction
II. Theoretical Framework
III. Proposing the framework: Exploring Strategic Models of Crowdfunding
IV. A New Model of Public–Private Partnership
V. Conclusion and Policy Implications

참고문헌 (44)

1. Akai, A. (2016). Trends and future prospects of crowdfunding: Expectations for local governments. Municipal Administration.
2. Burkett, E. (2011). A Crowdfunding Exemption-Online Investment Crowdfunding and US Secrutiies Regulation. Transactions: The Tennessee journal of business law, 13(1), 63-106.
3. Burtch, G., Di Benedetto, C. A. & Mudambi, S. M.(2014), “Leveraging Information Systems for Enhanced Product Innovation”, In Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management, 13(9), pp211-216.
4. Cabinet Office, Regional Revitalization Promotion Office. (2017). Guide to Furusato investment: Supplementary materials edition. Secretariat of the Furusato Investment Liaison Conference, Cabinet Secretariat.
5. Cabinet Office, Regional Revitalization Promotion Office. (2018). Guide to Furusato investment: Supplementary materials edition. Secretariat of the Furusato Investment Liaison Conference, Cabinet Secretariat.
6. Choi, Jae Kook, Cho, Keum-Sook, & Kukkyoung Moon. (2022). Moderating Effect of Recognition of Local Government Capability on the Relationship between Social Capital and Intent to Participate in Urban Regeneration Projects: Focusing on social trust and social network. The Journal of Korean Policy Studies, 22(1): 55-78.
7. Cumming, D. J., Gael Leboeuf and Armin Schwienbacher. (2015). Crowdfunding Models: Keep-It-All vs. All-Or-Nothing http://leeds-faculty.colorado.edu/ Bhagat/CrowdfundingModels-KeppItAll-AllorNothing.pdf
8. Gorbaneva, Olga I., Anton D. Murzin, & Guennady A. Ougolnitsky.(2024). Public-Private Partnership in Regional Development as a Tool of Sustainable Management. J Sustain Res,6(3):e240049. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20240049
9. Gyeonggi Provincial Council. (2016). Hope Project for the Termination of Basic Livelihood Recipients: Social Impact Bond (SIB) Consent Plan. 309th Extraordinary Session, 1st Report of the Health and Welfare Committee.
10. Heo, Myungsun. (2012). Analysis of Fund Operation Status in Local Governments: Focusing on Metropolitan Cities and Autonomous Districts. Audit Research Institute Research Report.
11. Furusato Investment Liaison Conference. (2015). Guide to Furusato investment. Furusato Investment Liaison Conference.
12. Jeon, Y.S. (2023). Success Conditions for Regional Regeneration and Proposal of ABS Model. KAJA, 134: 159-182.
13. Kim, Hak-sil. (2013). The Role of Community Business in the Process of Urban Regeneration. The Journal of Korean Policy Studies, 13(2): 41-60.
14. Kim, Juhyun. (2015). "A Study on the Impact of Urban Regeneration Projects on Resident Satisfaction: Focusing on the Culture and Arts Thinking Road in Nam-gu, Daegu." Master's Thesis, Daegu University.
15. Kim, Jieun. (2017). Exploring the Role of Public Enterprises in Fostering Regional Regeneration Companies. Policy Forum for Preparing the Urban Regeneration New Deal 2017 – Presentation Collection on Strategies for Nurturing Regional Regeneration Companies for Low-rise Residential Areas. pp: 31–44.
16. Korea Employment Information Service. (2019). Status of Extinction Risk in Metropolitan Governments.
17. Lee, Juwon. (2019). Urban Regeneration as a Platform for Social Economy. 2019 Daegu-Gyeongbuk Social Economy International Forum Proceedings.
18. Masse OSAKA. (2018). Proceedings of the research conference on regional revitalization through crowdfunding. Osaka Prefecture and Municipal Promotion Association.
19. Nakata, Y., et al. (2014). The use of crowdfunding by local governments: Significance and effectiveness [Digital version]. MUFG.
20. Oh, Deokseong & Yeom, Inseop. (2008). A Study on the Sustainability Evaluation of Downtown Regeneration Projects: Cases from Nottingham, UK and Daejeon, Korea. Seoul Urban Studies, 9(1): 65–83.
21. Park, Inkwon. (2012). A Normative Model of Community-led Local Development Strategy for Regional Regeneration. Korean Regional Development Association, 24(4): 1–26.
22. Park, Jungwoo & Tae-soo Song. (2013). A Conflict Minimization Scheme in Urban Regeneration Projects. The Journal of Korean Policy Studies, 13(3): 133-148.
23. Roberts, P. W., & Sykes, H., (2000), “Urban regeneration: A handbook”, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
24. Seoul Metropolitan Seongbuk-gu Office. (2017). 2017 Seongbuk-gu Social Investment Fund Regional Win-Win Crowdfunding Project Announcement. Seongbuk-gu Public Notice No. 2017-820.
25. Song, Aejeong & Kim, Yesung. (2018). A Case Study and Implications of Urban Regeneration Funding in Japan Using Crowdfunding. Journal of Urban Administration, 31(3): 29–40.
26. Shim, Jaeseung. (2016). A New Perspective on Government-Private Cooperation for Regional Regeneration. Journal of Korean Cadastral Information Association, 18(2): 117–132.
27. Shim, Jaeseung. (2017). A Study on the Feasibility of Local Government Revitalization Using the Hometown Tax Donation System – Focusing on Japan's Furusato Tax System. Journal of Korean Cadastral Information Association, 19(3): 111–124.
28. Shim, Jaeseung, Seo, Inseok & Jeong, Cheolju. (2019). Public-Private Partnership Regional Regeneration Projects Using Crowdfunding. Gyeongbuk Provincial Government Research Report. pp: 1–121.
29. Won, Goohwan. (1998). A Study on Fund Management Systems as Atypical Expenditures in Local Governments. Local Finance Journal, 3(1): 109–129.
30. Yasuda, T. (2017). The potential and challenges of regional revitalization through Furusato tax donation: Can it become a catalyst for empowering local businesses? MS&AD Research Institute, 52–61.
31. Yasuda, T., & Yasui, T. (2017). The theory and practice of Furusato tax donation. Sendenkaigi.
32. Yoon, Hyunseok. (2011). A Study on Cultural Urban Regeneration Strategies: Focusing on Gwangju. Master’s Thesis, Chonnam National University Graduate School of Culture.
33. Gyeongsangbuk-do Provincial Government. (2018, April 6). Official press release.
34. National Assembly Bill Information System. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://likms.assembly.go.kr/
35. Found Planner. (n.d.). Crowdfunding Conference Official Website. Retrieved from http://foundplanner.com
36. Financial News. (2019, September 28). Successful conclusion of the Seongbuk-gu crowdfunding participating enterprise competition. Financial News. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/ko-kr/news/national
37. Korea Crowdfunding Professional Society. (n.d.). Official Website. Retrieved from http://kcfps.or.kr
38. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. (n.d.). Local Finance 365. Retrieved from http://lofin.mois.go.kr
39. National Assembly Administrative Safety Subcommittee. (2019, April 4). The 367th Session, 3rd Meeting.
40. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. (2017, December 11 & 2018, December 19). Briefing materials on local finance and crowdfunding.
41. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. (n.d.). Meeting documents of the Furusato Tax Donation Research Committee. Retrieved from http://www.soumu.go.jp/main＿sosiki/kenkyu/furusato＿tax/
42. Koike, N. (2012). The mechanism and current status of the Furusato Tax Donation System: From the perspective of promoting local government appeal. Award-winning paper, Masse OSAKA Public Paper Competition. Retrieved from http://www.masse.or.jp/ikkrwebBrowse/material/files/jichi2012_03_03.pdf
43. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. (2007). Furusato Tax Research Committee Report. Retrieved from http://www.soumu.go.jp/main_sosiki/kenkyu/furusato_tax/go/
44. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. (n.d.). Furusato Tax Portal Site. Retrieved from http://www.soumu.go.jp/main_sosiki/jichi_zeisei/czaisei/czaiseiseido/furusato/archive/

참고문헌 더보기