전체게시판 최신게시물 15건
GIAPA
The Gyeong-In Association for Public Administration
경인행정학회에서 제공하는 논문 및 각종 자료입니다
학회자료 Library
저널명
한국정책연구(The Journal of Korean Policy Studies)
창간연도
2002년 2월
ISSN
(Print)1598-7817 , (Online)2713-6744
등재사항
KCI등재(2019.01 ~ 현재)
수록권호
제25권 3호
발행일
2025.09
수록논문
14 articles
유형
학술저널
주제
사회과학
발행기간
2002.02 ~ 2025.09
발행주기
연 4회(계간)
총 권호 수
77 volumes
총 논문 수
752 articles

초록

본 연구는 젊은 공무원들의 업무 소외 유발과 조용한 사직까지 예측하는 과잉 자격 인식의 통합 모형을 분석함으로써 조용한 사직에 관한 현재 지식에 기여한다. 우리는 또한 이들 변인 사이에서 자기 지향 완벽주의와 지각된 외부 평판의 조절 효과도 심층적으로 분석했다. 382명의 공무원 자료를 SPSS 26.0과 SPSS PROCESS 매크로를 사용하여 분석했다. 그 결과 업무 소외가 과잉 자격 인식과 조용한 사직의 관계를 매개하는 것으로 확인되었다. 자기 지향 완벽주의와 지각된 외부 평판을 조절변인으로 도입했을 때 유의한 상호작용 효과들이 나타났다. 종합적으로 살펴보면, 업무 소외가 지각된 과잉 자격의 부정적인 영향을 어떻게 더 악화시키는지를 밝혀준다. 공공부문에서 이러한 정서적 이탈을 줄이는 방안을 제시하기 위한 한계점, 실무적 시사점 및 향후 연구 방향을 함께 논의한다.

This research contributes to the current knowledge on quiet quitting by examining an integrated model in which perceived overqualification predicts quiet quitting among young civil servants through the mediating role of work alienation. The investigation also investigates the moderating effects of self-oriented perfectionism and perceived external prestige. Data from 382 government employees were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 and the SPSS PROCESS macro. The results confirmed that work alienation mediates the relationship between perceived overqualification and quiet quitting. Significant interaction effects also emerged when self-oriented perfectionism and perceived external prestige were introduced as moderators. Taken together, our findings sheds light on how work alienation further exacerbates the negative impact of perceived overqualification. Limitations, practical implications, and directions for future research are discussed to inform strategies aimed at reducing such emotional disengagement in the public sector.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 가설 개발
Ⅲ 연구방법
Ⅳ 분석결과
Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌 (68)

  1. 강대석(2025). 출세주의자들의 프리젠티즘 현상: 그 부작용과 처방책, 「경영학연구」 54(3): 581-600.
  2. 박지연·남승하(2023). 지각된 과잉자격의 영향요인에 관한 연구, 「한국정책연구」 23(2): 155-178.
  3. 김광태·이혜원·손영우(2023). 다차원적 조용한 사직 척도(MQQS) 타당화 연구, 「한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직」 36(4): 557-583.
  4. 주경일(2023). 일선 행정기관 내에서 MZ세대와 기성세대 간 관계성에 대한 인식 차이 비교 연구, 「한국정책연구」 23(3): 1-24.
  5. 임성근(2022). 공직사회의 MZ세대 신입 조직 구성원에 대한 인식: 팀장급 공무원의 주관적 인식을 중심으로, 「주관성연구」 63: 27-49.
  6. 오상빈·배현(2024). 한국 공공조직 구성원의 조용한 사직 영향요인 연구: 이직의도에 따른 조용한 사직 영향요인 간 차이를 중심으로, 「한국행정연구」 33(2): 199-232.
  7. 전종희(2022). MZ세대를 중심으로 한 ‘quiet quitting’(조용한 사직)의 특징과 개선 방안 연구, 「인문사회21」 16(3): 5117-5132.
  8. 하태수(2024). 공무원들의 적극행정 영향 요인 분석, 한국정책연구」 24(1): 137-160.
  9. Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  10. Anand, A., Doll, J., & Ray, P. (2024). Drowning in silence: a scale development and validation of quiet quitting and quiet firing. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(4), 721-743.
  11. Arar, T., Çetiner, N., & Yurdakul, G. (2023). Quiet quitting: Building a comprehensive theoretical framework. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 15(28), 122-138.
  12. Atalay, M., & Dağıstan, U. (2024). Quiet quitting: a new wine in an old bottle?. Personnel Review, 53(4), 1059-1074.
  13. Banai, M., & Reisel, W. D. (2007). The influence of supportive leadership and job characteristics on work alienation: A six-country investigation. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 463-476.
  14. Brender-Ilan, Y. A. E. L. (2012). How do income and its components and perception relate to alienation?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(2), 440-470.
  15. Carmeli, A., & Freund, A. (2009). Linking perceived external prestige and intentions to leave the organization: The mediating role of job satisfaction and affective commitment. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(3), 236-250.
  16. Chen, Y. J. (2009). Associations of perceived underemployment with in-role and organisational citizenship behaviours: The beneficiary perspective. Global Business and Economics Review, 11(3-4), 317-331.
  17. Chiaburu, D. S., Diaz, I., & De Vos, A. (2013). Employee alienation: relationships with careerism and career satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(1), 4-20.
  18. Chiaburu, D. S., Thundiyil, T., & Wang, J. (2014). Alienation and its correlates: A meta-analysis. European Management Journal, 32(1), 24-36.
  19. Cho, B., Lee, D., & Kim, K. (2014). How Does Relative Deprivation Influence Employees’ Intention to Leave a Merged Company? The Role of Organizational Identification. Human Resource Management, 53(3), 421-443.
  20. Chung, Y. W. (2018). Workplace ostracism and workplace behaviors: A moderated mediation model of perceived stress and psychological empowerment. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 31(3), 304–317.
  21. Clardy, A. (2005). Reputation, goodwill, and loss: Entering the employee training audit equation. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 279-304.
  22. Clardy, A. (2012). Organizational reputation: Issues in conceptualization and measurement. Corporate Reputation Review, 15, 285-303.
  23. Cook, L. C., & Kearney, C. A. (2014). Parent perfectionism and psychopathology symptoms and child perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 1-6.
  24. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative science quarterly, 239-263.
  25. Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review and methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial organizational psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 283-357). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Elgan, M. (2022). It’s time to quit quitting on the quiet quitters. https://www.computerworld.com/article/3673096/its-time-to-quit-quitting-on-the-quietquitters.html.
  28. Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Perceived overqualification and its outcomes: the moderating role of empowerment. Journal of applied psychology, 94(2), 557.
  29. Feng, J., & Wang, C. (2019). Does abusive supervision always promote employees to hide knowledge? From both reactance and COR perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1455-1474.
  30. Fine, S., & Nevo, B. (2008). Too smart for their own good? A study of perceived cognitive overqualification in the workforce. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(2), 346-355.
  31. Formica, S., & Sfodera, F. (2022). The great resignation and quiet quitting paradigm shifts: An overview of current situation and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(8), 899-907.
  32. Fornell, C., & Larcker. D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  33. Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., Siskou, O., Konstantakopoulou, O.,Moisoglou, I., Gallos, P. & Kaitelidou, D. (2023). Quiet quitting among employees: A proposed cut-off score for the “quiet quitting scale. Research Square.
  34. Giorelli, M., Pillemer, J., & Rothbard, N. P. (2021). More than a name: How organizational reputation shapes employee identity and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 1-30.
  35. Gün, İ., Çetinkaya Kutun, F., & Söyük, S. (2025). Mediating effect of turnover intention on the relationship between job burnout and quiet quitting in nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1-9.
  36. Guo, L., Cheng, K., Luo, J., & Zhao, H. (2022). Trapped in a loss spiral: How and when work alienation relates to knowledge hiding, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(20), 4004-4033.
  37. Guo, L., Du, J., & Zhang, J. (2024). How supervisor perceived overqualification influences exploitative leadership: The mediating role of job anxiety and the moderating role of psychological entitlement, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(6), 976-991.
  38. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business review, 31(1), 2-24.
  39. Harandi, A., & Mirzaeian Khamseh, P. (2024). Can perceived overqualification increase cyberloafing? An emphasis on the mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 409–424.
  40. Hayes, F. A. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A Regression-based approach. NY: Guilford Press.
  41. Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 456.
  42. Kang, D. S., Stewart, J., & Kim, H. (2011). The effects of perceived external prestige, ethical organizational climate, and leader‐member exchange (LMX) quality on employees’ commitments and their subsequent attitudes. Personnel Review, 40(6), 761-784.
  43. Khan, J., Saeed, I., Fayaz, M., Zada, M., and Jan, D. (2022). Perceived overqualification? Examining its nexus with cyberloafing and knowledge hiding behavior: Harmonious passion as a moderator. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 993-1015.
  44. Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2022). When quiet quitting is worse than the real thing. Harvard Business Review, 1, 1-5.
  45. Lee, A., Erdogan, B., Tian, A. W., Willis, S., & Cao, J. (2021). Perceived overqualification and task performance: Reconciling two opposing pathways. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94, 80-106.
  46. Li, S., & Chen, Y. (2018). The relationship between psychological contract breach and employees’ counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effect of organizational cynicism and work alienation. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1273.
  47. Ling, J., Chok, J. I., Zhang, W., & Lowery, C. M. (2025). The Impacts of Organizational Changes on Work Engagement and Quiet Quitting. American Journal of Management, 25(1), 13-28.
  48. Liu, S., Luksyte, A., Zhou, L. E., Shi, J., & Wang, M. O. (2015). Overqualification and counterproductive work behaviors: Examining a moderated mediation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 250-271.
  49. Liu, T., Liu, H., & Qi, Y. (2015). Construction land expansion and cultivated land protection in urbanizing China: Insights from national land surveys, 1996–2006. Habitat International, 46, 13-22.
  50. Luksyte, A., Spitzmueller, C., & Maynard, D. C. (2011). Why do overqualified incumbents deviate? Examining multiple mediators. Journal of occupational health psychology, 16(3), 279.
  51. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
  52. Mahand, T., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet quitting-causes and opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9-19.
  53. Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(4), 509-536.
  54. McKee‐Ryan, F. M., Virick, M., Prussia, G. E., Harvey, J., and Lilly, J. D. (2009). Life after the layoff: Getting a job worth keeping. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 561–580.
  55. Nair, N., & Vohra, N. (2009). Developing a new measure of work alienation. Journal of Workplace Rights, 14(3), 293-309.
  56. Nair, N., & Vohra, N. (2010). An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Management Decision,48(4), 600-615.
  57. Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta‐analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational behavior, 33(2), 216-234.
  58. Pacht, A. R. (1984). Reflections on perfection. American psychologist, 39(4), 386-390.
  59. Park, M., & Kim, Y. (2025). Revisiting public service motivation: A context-specific exploration of its linkages to job performance pre- and post-COVID-19. Chinese Public Administration Review, 16(2), 77-88.
  60. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  61. Scheyett, A. (2023). Quiet quitting. Social Work, 68(1), 5-7.
  62. Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & Van Riel, C. B. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1051-1062.
  63. Smith, M. M., Saklofske, D. H., Stoeber, J., & Sherry, S. B. (2016). The big three perfectionism scale: A new measure of perfectionism. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(7), 670-687.
  64. Srivastava, A., Pandey, A., Sharma, D. & Ghosh, K. (2025). Apathy under the surface: Theorizing quiet quitting’s impact on organizational learning. Development and Learning in Organizations, 39 (2), pp. 15-17.
  65. Stănescu, D. F., & Romașcanu, M. C. (2024). The impact of perceived social support on workplace loneliness: The mediation role of work alienation. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 133-144.
  66. Stoeber, J., & Otto, K. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 295–319.
  67. Xueyun, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., Rahman, M. K., Gao, J., & Yang, Q. (2023). Modelling the significance of organizational conditions on quiet quitting intention among Gen Z workforce in an emerging economy. Scientific reports, 13(1), 15438.
  68. Wu, X., & Ma, F. (2023). How perceived overqualification affects radical creativity: The moderating role of supervisor-subordinate guanxi. Current Psychology, 42(29), 25127-25141.

참고문헌 더보기
한국정책연구 (752 articles / 77 volumes) 2025년도(논문 수 36) 제25권 3호(논문 수 14) KCI등재 ISSN 1598-7817 (Print) , 2713-6744 (Online)

학회지 논문 게시판 목록입니다.

이메일주소 무단수집 거부

본 홈페이지에 게시된 이메일 주소가 전자우편 수집 프로그램이나 그 밖의 기술적 장치를 이용하여 무단으로 수집되는 것을 거부하며, 이를 위반시 정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호 등에 관한 법률(이하 정보통신망법)에 의해 형사처벌됨을 유념하시기 바랍니다.

정보통신망법 제50조의2 (전자우편주소의 무단 수집행위 등 금지)
  1. 누구든지 전자우편주소의 수집을 거부하는 의사가 명시된 인터넷 홈페이지에서 자동으로 전자우편주소를 수집하는 프로그램 그 밖의 기술적 장치를 이용하여 전자우편주소를 수집하여서는 아니된다.
  2. 누구든지 제1항의 규정을 위반하여 수집된 전자우편주소를 판매·유통하여서는 아니된다.
  3. 누구든지 제1항 및 제2항의 규정에 의하여 수집·판매 및 유통이 금지된 전자우편주소임을 알고 이를 정보전송에 이용하여서는 아니 된다.
닫기